Gondola ride???
Oct. 30th, 2006 11:39 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The Romantic Lover 59% partner focus, 71% aggressiveness, 35% adventurousness |
Based on the results of this test, it is highly likely that: You prefer your romance and love to be traditional rather than daring or out-of-the-ordinary, you would rather pursue than be pursued and, when it comes to physical love, your satisfaction comes more from providing a wonderful time to your partner than simply seeking your own. This places you in the Lover Style of: The Romantic Lover. The Romantic Lover is a wonderful Lover Style, and is the hallmark of young love--the Romantic Lover often loves the idea of being in love, and being a wonderful lover, and so they try to bring their prospective partners every bit of joy or happiness that they can. They are the serenaders, and the ones to rent carriages in the park or take a gondola ride down a canal. The Romantic Lover is a treasure to find, though they sometimes are prone to being hurt if their advances are ignored or harshly rebuffed. In terms of physical love, the Romantic Lover can seem shy, but usually it is simply a by-product of wanting to be perfect for their lover, and often needs some extra encouragement and re-assurance to truly feel at ease. Given a special, intimate evening, and the right lover, the Romantic Lover can be a delight in bed. Best Compatibility can probably be found with: The Classic Lover (most of all) or the Suave Lover, or the Exotic Lover. Congratulations! |
..."Given a special, intimate evening, and the right lover, the Romantic Lover can be a delight in bed."
*grins*
It's kinda scary how true this is. And no, I don't just mean the 'delight in bed' bit
no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 10:01 pm (UTC)2) You're not shy, are you? Turns out, neither am I.
3) Mmm...
4) Have to start somewhere.
5) I will if you will.
[ooc: I never knew Vecchio could be so gay. He thinks he sees what Fraser likes in Kowalski now! Y'know, Talos and Kowalski looking alike and all. Hair!]
no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 10:20 pm (UTC)2) So say it then. The thing's broken.
3) ...
you're a tease.4) I suppose so.
5) Consider it done.
(ooc: Yes, it's all about the hair... I'm pretty sure that Fraser has some sort of unspoken agreement with Kowalski that, if he cuts, dyes and/or fraks up his hair above and beyond Fraser's liking...the whole thing is off.)
no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 10:33 pm (UTC)2) It's a quiz. You take things way too seriously. You need to relax.
3)...
it has been known.Only when I have something to gain.4) Suppose? You surprise me.
5) Considering. So who won?
[ooc: You think Fraser'd ever let Vecchio touch it? Kowalski's hair, I mean...]
no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 11:03 pm (UTC)youit would be easy? Where's the fun in that?2) Relaxed is my middle name...only not really.
3) ...
cute.Such as?4) I'm unpredictable.
5) Call it even?
(ooc: Impossible. He'd just flatten it. Asher might not be quick to bite, but, hey, the Mountie's unhinged. I'm just sayin...)
no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 11:17 pm (UTC)2) I'd like to know what your real one is.
3) ...
thanks. Now that would be telling, Asher.4) No argument here.
5) You're asking me?
[ooc: I apologise for #1... if Fraser lets me touch Kowalski's hair, never mind Vecchio...?]